Though fundamental rights and freedoms are the stated pre-eminent purpose of this, Part I of the Cayman Islands Constitutional Order, 2009, the basis of much of the confusion and misunderstanding can be gleamed, (as is the case with so many other similar documents and overarching laws throughout the common law world), from the drafting style inherent thereto!
Virtually every clause begins with wording, which is along the lines: "No person shall be subject Government Authority which....results in a discriminatory position for the person affected ".
It should be quite clear however that there are rights which clearly, in the normal course of dealings in society, as between citizens are enforceable by each person for the protection of his or her individual rights. One relevant example would be such rights as the enjoyment of one's right to use of their property or practice of their religion.
These, must by their very nature, be enforceable between citizens inter se.
This argument is the essence of the issue - that is to say - given the constant evolution of relationships, not just between people and governments, but between different groupings of people who are in fact governed by ONE government, (recalling also that virtually every society now acknowledges that its people and its government is composed of a variety of ethnic and cultural groups), the Bill of Rights is the only aspect, element of tool in the rule of law which is clear and specific enough to provide necessary protection (if properly upheld!)
Where the behaviour of a particular ethnic or cultural group is such as would threaten the livelihood of another ethnic and cultural group and given that while there are usually specific laws preventing discrimination in hiring practices(Labour Laws etc.), there is usually nothing, in any society, other than those protections contained in the Bill of Rights, which speak to actions en masse.
When one grouping of people, within one society act against the human rights enshrined in the Bill of Rights of another group, the invocation of the fundamental freedoms and protection are clearly necessary to invoke. It is thus the Bill of Rights to which people must turn to seek to ensure their collective well-being.
The effect of any modern Bill of Rights simply cannot, any longer, be viably argued to apply only vertically (as between Government and the governed - within a particular state/jurisdiction). The reasons behind its obvious evolution to a clearly horizontal role are inherently obvious around the globe today! Indeed, the implications of this crucial part of the Constitution is far greater than that.
Additional pragmatic examples, which I shall continue to put forward, will also support the importance of the fundamental recognition of the wider ranging effect and implication of this most vital part of the Constitution.



















